Showing posts with label diacritics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label diacritics. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Taishanese Romanization

Romanizations are important for indicating Taishanese pronunciation. Many different romanization schemes have been used from the International Phonetic Alphabet to the Wade-Giles-like scheme in the DLI Basic Course or the Pinyin-like scheme in the Kaiping Character Dictionary 开平方音字典. My preferred transcription scheme is more or less a hybrid of the latter two. This romanization can be easily explained in terms of consonants, vowels and tones.

There are 20 consonants (previously discussed here and here). The table below organizes the consonants such that consonants produced with the lips are at the top, those produced with the tip of the tongue in the middle, and those produced with the back of the tongue at the bottom. (The last row is actually those produced with both the lips and back of the tongue simultaneously.)

b p m f  
d t n lh l
j ch   s y
g k ng h  
gw kw     w

Most of these consonants should be straightforward for English speakers to pronounce, save the lateral fricative, lh. It’s the consonant in 四 lhi “four.”

The vowels (which I’ve touched on briefly) are at once simpler and maddeningly more complex. There are five basic vowels:

a e i o u

In some dialects, there is another schwa-like vowel quality, similar to the a in about or in the Cantonese word 乜 mat. This vowel is usually a predicable variant of one of the vowels above. For example, when occurring before t, this vowel is usually a variant of e, as in 的 et (for some accents). Likewise, when occurring before ng, this vowel is usually a variant of u, as in 東 ung (for some accents).

These vowels combine into six diphthongs, formed by appending i or u to the vowels above. (For the linguistics geeks, the front vowels pair with u, while the back vowels pair with i. The central(ish) vowel a pairs with both i and u.)

au eu iu
ai oi ui

There is, in fact, yet one more diphthong: ia. This diphthong corresponds to the vowel e, so in these accents, words like 車, 吃 and 聽 are pronounced chia, hiak and hiang. Furthermore, the diphthong eu then becomes a triphthong: iau.

The tricky part is that, although one can transcribe all Taishanese with this five-vowel framework, the vowels trade places (sort of like musical chairs) from one accent to another. The most famous of these vowel shifts is the I-E shift. Where some dialects have the i sound (as in 四 lhi or 心 lhim), other dialects have an ei or e sound (as in 四 lhei or 心 lhem). (Damn, ei is yet another diphthong!)

Rather than propose a single way to transcribe a word like 四—lhi or lhei?—I am simply proposing that these five simple vowels are able to accommodate the full range of vowel qualities, even across various accents.

Lastly, there are five basic tones. I’ve written about these at length here and here. The table below provides the tones, their description, and an example written both in Chinese and in this romanization scheme.

1 2 3 4 5
mid-level high-level low-level low-falling high-falling
偷 口 頭 厚 後
hau hāu häu hạu hàu

Diacritics are used to denote the tones. The macron, trema, underdot and grave accent respectively denote the high level tone, the low level tone, the low falling tone and the mid falling tone. The mid level tone is indicated by the lack of any diacritic.

These tones could all alternatively be written without any diacritic. Instead of a diacritic, one could use the tone number, so the five vowels could be written with a following number. I chose to write this number superscripted for my aesthetic.

hau1 hau2 hau3 hau4 hau5

In addition to these basic tones, there are changed tones. The mid and low level tones can become rising tones (mid rising and low rising), while the falling tones can become dipping tones (low dipping and mid dipping). Since these changed tones are derived from the base tones, I simply indicate the changed tone with the addition of an asterisk (*). Thus, a word like kwọi “this” undergoes the tone change to become kwọi* “here,” where the combination of the underdot and asterisk indicates a low-dipping tone. (These words could also be written as kwoi4 and kwoi4*.)

It’s a bit of a mess, but that’s my romanization scheme in a nutshell.

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Basic Course: Lesson 1

The first lesson of the Basic Course presents the basic syllable rhymes. The basic ingredients of the rhymes are the five tones, five vowel qualities, two syllabic nasals and six final consonants. These combine to make 174 rhymes.

Tones. There are five basic tones, three of which also serve as entering tones. Each tone is described using expanded Chao numbers.

  • mid (33)
  • high (55)
  • low (11)
  • low falling (10)
  • mid falling (42)

The tone descriptions above are different than the names given in the course. The course presents tones in the context of the four tone groups of Middle Chinese (even 平, rising 上, departing 去 and entering 入) split into two registers (upper 陰 and lower 陽). I’m not a big fan of using these terms in English; I prefer names that reflect the tones’ actual pitch contour. There are some benefits to using the Middle Chinese categories, but these categories can also deceive; for example, the low falling tone is classified as “lower rising” in English (陽上).

The course transcribes the tones with diacritics, as in the examples below with the letter “a”:

  • mid: à
  • high: a
  • low: ā
  • low falling: ạ̄
  • mid falling: â

This transcription system diverges significantly from others I’m familiar with. Some of these diacritics are the exact opposite of what they denote in Hanyu pinyin. Most glaringly, the grave accent (`) denotes a falling tone in pinyin, but a mid tone in the course book; likewise, the macron (¯) denotes a high level tone in pinyin, but a low tone here. I’m going to have to play around with a more comfortable way to transcribe these tones; for now, I’m inclined to use pinyin diacritics and expand on these as necessary. But that’s all for the tones.

Vowels. The five basic vowel contrasts are roughly the same as those of Latin or Spanish: a e i o u. The course transcribes the u vowel as oo—I am definitely not a big fan of this transcription.

The vowel e never appears in this simple form. As a rhyme of its own, it takes the form of a diphthong: ei (like the rhyme in say). When combining with consonants, it takes the form of ia before u, ng or k (i.e. velars) and ie before m, n, p, t. Similarly, the course transcribes oo as u before ng or k; since I am such a non-fan of oo, I intend to transcribe this vowel as u.

In quality, the o spoken in the course is most like the English o in four, not like the Spanish o. The a is most like the a in father than the Spanish a.

These vowels combine into seven diphthongs by adding either i or u to the end: aai, aau, iau, ei, iu, oi, ooi. From here on out, I’ll intend to simplify them as: ai, au, iau (or eu), ei, iu, oi, ui.

Final consonants. There are six final consonants: m, n, ng, p, t, k. A set of nasals and a set of plosives in the three basic places of articulation (labial, dental, velar).

The rounded vowels o and u are never followed by labial consonants m and p. (Whenever you see transcriptions ending with “op” in English, this spelling is almost invariably the transcription of the ap rhyme.)

Lastly, the three plosive consonants (p, t, k) only occur with three of the tones: mid, high and mid falling. In my family’s dialect, the low tone also occurs with the final consonants; I’ll have to keep this in mind as I continue on the course.